{"id":25087,"date":"2020-04-02T18:05:33","date_gmt":"2020-04-02T18:05:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/themint.kinsta.cloud\/?p=25087"},"modified":"2021-10-02T11:39:49","modified_gmt":"2021-10-02T11:39:49","slug":"ten-out-of-ten-for-five","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/ten-out-of-ten-for-five\/","title":{"rendered":"Ten out of ten for five"},"content":{"rendered":"

As the new decade begins, The Mint<\/i> asked a quintet of our 2019 #NotTheNobel Finalists to name their book of the past decade and to tell us why it wins their nomination.\u00a0<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

While experts in their field are a sound source of opinion on books covering their area of study, choosing one book from the countless number of texts must be a tough one for each of them. In a decade made hugely significant by emerging from the financial crisis there was any number of books seeking to address the fundamental questions that were scattered by the failure of 2008. Our reviewers are well equipped for the challenge:<\/p>\n

Professor of Community Justice and Social Economic Development in the Department of Africana Studies at John Jay College, Jessica Gordon-Nembhard<\/b>.<\/p>\n

Professor of\u00a0Economics\u00a0at Bard College and Senior Scholar at the Levy Economics Institute, L. Randall Wray<\/b>.<\/p>\n

Author of Doughnut Economics<\/i>, Kate Raworth<\/b>.<\/p>\n

Distinguished Research Fellow at UCL and author of Debunking Economics,<\/i> Steve Keen<\/b>.<\/p>\n

Chief executive of On Purpose, Tom Rippin<\/b>.<\/p>\n

The books:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Ages of Discord:
\nA Structural-Demographic Analysis of American History<\/b><\/p>\n

by Peter Turchin<\/i><\/p>\n

Review by Steve Keen<\/p>\n

Peter Turchin\u2019s work to develop a dynamic theory of social change, which he calls ‘Cliodynamics’ is the most promising development I\u2019ve seen in the broad field of social science. I have been attempting to develop genuine dynamic analysis in economics for decades now, but the fetish the Neoclassical mainstream has for equilibrium modelling means that, bar a complete Kuhnian revolution, equilibrium-oriented methods will continue their dominance.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

That Kuhnian revolution might well come from history. As historian of science, Thomas Kuhn, observed, scientific revolutions often begin outside a discipline dominated by a failed paradigm, because the hold of that paradigm is so great that the pre-conditions needed for a new approach to blossom do not exist. That is certainly the case in economics, where non-orthodox thinkers are excluded from the leading academic institutions and forced to subsist in academic backwaters with excessive workloads and trivial levels of research funding.<\/p>\n

No such entrenched dominance of equilibrium methods exists in history, and in fact the resistance Turchin faces is resistance to mathematical practices in general, in a discipline which still sees its subject as \u201cone damned thing after another\u201d, as Arnold Toynbee once observed. Turchin, on page 6, insists instead that the overall stability of pre-industrial societies follows a \u201cregular, albeit dynamically complex, pattern involving at least two cycles superimposed on each other (plus exogenous stochasticity on top of that)\u201d.<\/p>\n

Applying the same dynamic-systems perspective to modern Western society, he finds that the forces pushing for social breakdown are so dominant today that it deserves to be called the Age of Discord II\u2014with the Age of Discord I culminating in the American Civil War.<\/p>\n

Since his frequency of interest is completely outside the purview of Neoclassical economists\u2014who are incapable of imagining that society has been anything other than capitalist, let alone considering that capitalism itself might collapse\u2014Turchin is safe to develop his methodology away from their attacks. His work could be the seed from which decent complex systems dynamical analysis of society finally develops in the social sciences.<\/p>\n

Turchin, P. (2016). Ages of Discord: A Structural-Demographic Analysis of American History<\/i>. Chaplin, Beresta Books.<\/p>\n

Development Drowned and Reborn: The Blues and Bourbon Restorations in Post-Katrina New Orleans\u00a0<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

by Clyde\u00a0Woods, Laura\u00a0Pulido and Jordan T.\u00a0Camp<\/i><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Review by Jessica Gordon-Nembhard<\/p>\n

In\u00a0Development Drowned and Reborn,<\/i> Woods et al cover the multicultural history of colonialism and resistance in early Louisiana to the present, and how that has impacted the kind of city New Orleans is, and its ability to recover from Hurricane Katrina. They provide a unique analysis of the early common agenda between Native Americans\/First Nations and Africans in America: oppose slavery, racism, and monopoly; and the shared multiple strategies for resistance, cultural preservation and \u201cintellectual mobilisation to build continental-scale multi-ethnic alliances\u201d (page 2). Both groups \u201csupported the realisation of social justice and sustainable human community and cultural development\u201d (page 2) in myriad ways \u2013 and continue to do so.<\/p>\n

In addition, Woods connects the need and struggle for working class democracy with the democratic principles in Black cultural production. He argues for cultural and economic sustainability based on indigenous knowledge and democratic participation. ‘This Blues epistemology’ (as Woods calls it), he explains more in his 1998 book\u00a0Development Arrested<\/i>.\u00a0The Blues reflect the \u201corigins, varieties and consequences of life lived,\u201d from the perspective of African Americans \u201cdedicated to the preservation of their humanity\u201d (1998, page 216). It\u2019s a form of cultural resistance in a brutal, oppressive, and racist society.\u00a0 This privileges indigenous knowledge and organic intellectuals, and denies power to elites. The Blues vision is a \u201cdialectically polyrhythmic, democracy where both cooperation and individual expression thrive\u201d (1998, page 216).<\/p>\n

Both books highlight how African Americans have struggled to attain this vision in the Delta Region of the US South, especially in New Orleans, over centuries.\u00a0 And provide hope that African Americans can continue to survive and resist by engaging in democratic collective economic action.<\/p>\n

Why was\u00a0Development Drowned and Reborn<\/i>\u00a0so important for the past decade and important for the coming decade? Woods’ research is a crowning example of how important it is to learn from the past, especially to delve deep into that past to resurrect a more detailed past about multicultural resistance and collective action toward social and economic justice. We need to understand the past in that way because 21st century forces are still trying to divide us and pit indigenous peoples against people of African descent, and long-time residents against new immigrants, etc.\u00a0 <\/span>This book shows us that all oppressed people have similar struggles and strategies for liberation that are still with us and relevant today.<\/p>\n

The book is also important because New Orleans and the Gulf Coast have spent more than a decade trying to recover from the manmade and policy disasters that Hurricane Katrina exposed.\u00a0 <\/span>It shows that adhering to the principles and strategies of economic democracy and community-controlled development highlighted in the book are the best ways to achieve sustainable recovery.<\/p>\n

This lesson is going to continue to be important as climate change creates stronger and stronger hurricanes and more and more low-lying areas populated by marginalised people will be vulnerable to flooding and destruction. We have to challenge environmental racism along with global warming, and connect solutions to the proven strategies of grassroots economic organising and democratic collective action.\u00a0<\/p>\n

C\u00a0 <\/span>Woods, L Pulido and J.T. Camp (ed), (2017) Development Drowned and Reborn: The Blues and Bourbon Restorations in Post-Katrina New Orleans, <\/i>University of Georgia Press.<\/p>\n

Keynes: The Return Of The Master. Public Affairs\u00a0<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

by Robert Skidelsky<\/i><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Review by L. Randall Wray<\/p>\n

I chose Lord Skidelsky\u2019s book, published just over a decade ago, because it was both prescient and premature. It was prescient because it recognised so early into the Global Financial Crisis that mainstream economics was suddenly and indisputably dangerously irrelevant. As the Queen had rightly objected, none of the mainstreamers had seen the crisis coming, and Skidelsky lays out why they could not possibly have done so.<\/p>\n

He was, however, premature in announcing the return of the master, J.M. Keynes \u2014 as the following decade has made clear, and even as many of us had wished it to be so. Unfortunately, the cold, dead hands of Zombie Economics \u2014 perhaps best represented by Greg Mankiw today (who has presented an utterly nonsensical critique of Modern Monetary Theory at the latest manifestation of the Allied Social Science Association\u2019s ASSA\u2019s bread and circus fest in San Diego) still dominates economics instruction.<\/p>\n

Skidelsky has continued to make major contributions over the past decade, both in his scholarly work and through projects at the so-called Institution for\u00a0New<\/i>\u00a0Economic Thinking (which, unfortunately, is dominated by the Old Zombie way of thinking and mostly promotes texts that deviate only slightly from Mankiw). But a concern of this book \u2014 with continued development in his later books \u2013 is Keynes\u2019s ethics, morals, and early beliefs.<\/p>\n

According to Keynes, \u201cTo make the world ethically better was the only justifiable purpose of economic striving.\u201d (page 133) The goal is not to maximise pleasure, but rather goodness; this is easier to do once individuals \u201chave a certain level of material comfort\u201d(page 139). The barrier is the \u201clove of money\u201d because it is morally inefficient \u2013\u00a0the objectless pursuit of wealth \u2013\u00a0and economically inefficient as the psychology of the miser depresses demand (page 142).<\/p>\n

The conflict for the moral philosopher is that the love of money drives capitalism, which helps to provide the required material comfort necessary to live \u201cwisely, agreeably, and well,\u201d (page 144) but it is also a neurosis because there can never be a point of satiation (page 153). The relevance of Skidelsky\u2019s book has only increased as we, collectively, have come to realise that humankind has just a dozen years left to chart a new course or face certain annihilation. \u00a0<\/p>\n

Skidelsky, R (2009) Keynes: The Return Of The Master<\/i>. Public Affairs, Perseus Books Group.<\/p>\n

Owning Our Future: the emerging ownership revolution\u00a0<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

by Marjorie\u00a0Kelly<\/i>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Review by Kate Raworth<\/p>\n

The book of the last decade that has most influenced my work has to be Marjorie Kelly\u2019s. I read it while researching and writing\u00a0Doughnut Economics<\/i>\u00a0and it profoundly influenced my thinking about the design of organisations of all kinds \u2013 from corporations and governments to cooperatives and community groups.<\/p>\n

Kelly sets out five key design traits that shape what an enterprise can be or do in the world \u2013 its purpose, membership, governance, finance and networks \u2013 and then contrasts these traits in extractive enterprise that is centred on financial return, versus generative enterprise that is centred on a living purpose.<\/p>\n

This deceptively simple framework has since become core to my work, especially with businesses. While firms are typically eager to explore whether the design of their products is compatible with getting into the Doughnut, I quickly point out that what matters most is the design of the business itself \u2013 its purpose, membership, governance, finance and networks \u2013 because these design traits will either trap the business in extractive mode or enable it to be part of a regenerative future. The conversations that follow are tough and confronting because they go to the heart of the structure of economic power. As Kelly says: \u201cOwnership structures \u2013 property and who holds it \u2013 are at the foundation of every economy. So if we want a different economy, we have to get the assets in different hands\u201d.<\/p>\n

Kelly, M. (2012), Owning Our Future: the emerging ownership revolution, <\/i>Berret-Koehler<\/p>\n

The Spirit Level: Why Equality is Better for Everyone\u00a0<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

by Kate Pickett and Richard G Wilkinson<\/i><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Review by Tom Rippin<\/p>\n

The Spirit Level<\/i> was published at the dawn of the past decade and put inequality squarely on the map.<\/p>\n

By 2010, in the UK alone, it had been referenced in big speeches by the leaders of both major political parties and 75 MPs signed the \u201cEquality Pledge\u201d. And this all happened four years before Picketty\u2019s Capital in the 21<\/i>st<\/sup><\/i> Century<\/i>.<\/p>\n

The Spirit Level<\/i>\u2019s argument is deceptively simple: The more equal a society, the better its social outcomes in term of, for example, levels of trust, educational achievement, crime, suicide, mental illness and even consumerism.<\/p>\n

So far so intuitive. The eye-opener is that the better outcomes are driven not only by improvements for the worse off, but those at the top benefit from a more equal society too. It powerfully demonstrates the systems’ principle that for the whole system to be health, every part of the system needs to be healthy. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Since the Spirit Level<\/i>\u2019s publication, inequality has been a part of mainstream political, social and even business dictionaries. Its simple message planted a powerful seed ten years ago. Over the next ten years, we must put its lessons into action.<\/p>\n

Pickett, K and R Wilkinson (2010) The Spirit Level: Why Equality is Better for Everyone, Penguin Books<\/i>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

As the new decade begins, The Mint asked a quintet of our 2019 #NotTheNobel Finalists to name their book of the past decade and to tell us why it wins … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":25154,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"content-type":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[82],"tags":[152,596,1282,1285,721,99,1009,1284,1294,319,1287,1290,1288,269,1283,1250,1292,1286,1291,1279,344,1295,1289,184,1293,1281,1008],"class_list":["post-25087","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-reviews","tag-capitalism","tag-climate-crisis","tag-clyde-woods","tag-development-drowned-and-reborn-the-blues-and-bourbon-restorations-in-post-katrina-new-orleans","tag-economic-power","tag-inequality","tag-jessica-gordon-nembhard","tag-jordan-t-camp","tag-kate-pickett","tag-kate-raworth","tag-katrina","tag-keynes","tag-keynes-the-return-of-the-master-public-affairs","tag-l-randall-wray","tag-laura-pulido","tag-mar-2020","tag-marjorie-kelly","tag-new-orleans","tag-owning-our-future-the-emerging-ownership-revolution","tag-peter-turchin","tag-property-rights","tag-richard-g-wilkinson","tag-robert-skidelsky","tag-steve-keen","tag-the-spirit-level-why-equality-is-better-for-everyone","tag-thomas-kuhn","tag-tom-rippin"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25087","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25087"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25087\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/25154"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25087"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25087"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25087"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}