{"id":27339,"date":"2020-12-16T12:05:14","date_gmt":"2020-12-16T12:05:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/themint.kinsta.cloud\/?p=27339"},"modified":"2020-12-16T12:05:14","modified_gmt":"2020-12-16T12:05:14","slug":"rein-in-men","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/rein-in-men\/","title":{"rendered":"Rein in men"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\u00a0<\/div>\n<div>\n<p class=\"TMbodyDCCOMPUTER\"><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Women\u2019s reality is often invisible in economic analysis and that\u2019s not hard to see. And the lack of women in economics too is clear, even outside the mainstream. The Institute for New Economic Thinking\u2019s major conference in 2017 was particularly noticeable for its lack of women on the stage, which one of our columnists, Frances Coppola, wrote about at the time as <\/span><span class=\"TMhyperlink\" style=\"font-size: 1rem;\"><i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.coppolacomment.com\/2017\/10\/beyond-disappointment.html\"><u>Beyond disappointment<\/u><\/a><\/i><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">. The result was substantial sole searching on INET\u2019s part.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p class=\"TMbodycopyCOMPUTER\">Worse still, the past few years have thrown up more and more <span class=\"TMhyperlink\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2020\/01\/07\/business\/economy\/economics-race-gender.html\"><u>revelations about sexism and harassment towards women economists, and even sexual assault<\/u><\/a><\/span>. And the problem seems worse in economics than in other disciplines. At least now the issue is out in the open and procedures have been developed \u2013 if late in the day. This does not mean though that there is recognition of the need for a diversity of thinking in the mainstream.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p class=\"TMbodycopyCOMPUTER\">Indeed <i>The Mint<\/i> started with a preponderance of male authors. I began working to change this when it was pointed out that most of the contributors and speakers at our events were white male and middle-aged.\u00a0 With male economists in the majority, and who may have more time than their female counterparts who carry most of the caring responsibilities, this remains a challenge.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p class=\"TMbodycopyCOMPUTER\">So how has this lack of female economists affected economic analysis?\u00a0 First off there is a lack of gender-segregated data, which is not a problem with economics alone as Caroline Criado Perez showed in her best-selling book <i>Invisible Women: exposing data bias in a world designed for men<\/i>. Feminist economists have worked for over 50 years to try and redress this problem.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p class=\"TMbodycopyCOMPUTER\">Then there is the big issue of so-called women\u2019s work, not being counted as labour in economic statistics and modelling as much of it doesn\u2019t involve financial transactions.\u00a0 And for women who do work in the formal economy, pay is low and unequal. These crucial issues are covered in this issue.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p class=\"TMbodycopyCOMPUTER\">For me, the most fundamental problem with economic analysis highlighted by feminist economics is that most of it ignores institutions \u2013 meaning the rules of the economic and social game.\u00a0 The world of economics is largely about the undifferentiated and unconnected individual atoms of homo-economicus and flows of goods and services. Institutional economics, a strand of economics with at least 100 years of literature, is hardly taught.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p class=\"TMbodycopyCOMPUTER\">Many of these rules or expectations, formal and informal, are the ones that privilege men and bind women.\u00a0 They determine power.\u00a0 Many of them, like racism, are invisible to all but those who they effect. They can be about looks, tones of voice, attitudes, gossip and more, as much as rules written down.\u00a0 .\u00a0 If women point them out, they may be told to stop being victims and get on with it as <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/society\/2020\/nov\/22\/new-equalities-commissioner-attacked-modern-feminism-and-metoo\">the new UK Equalities Commissioner has, attacking \u201cmodern feminism<\/a>\u201d.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p class=\"TMbodycopyCOMPUTER\">It is no wonder that feminist economists tend to be more interested in institutions than most economists. And I believe this interest is a hugely important service to economics as a whole. Institutions structure our economy and effect who wins and who loses, including the environment. Just consider Brexit, Trump and Black Lives Matter. How can these be understood without using an institutional frame?\u00a0 Hopefully with increasing numbers of female economists, they will help put institutions front and centre in economics where they belong.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p class=\"TMbodycopyCOMPUTER\">So in this issue we have a range of contributions exploring women\u2019s economic reality:\u00a0 Madeleine Bunting talks about her recent book on the caring economy; Naila Kabeer challenges the \u201crandomista\u201d narrative on women\u2019s equality; Jennifer Cohen argues that feminist economics is not about \u201cwomen\u2019s issues\u201d; Marianna Leite urges us to take responsibility for changing the system; and Madhavi Venkatesan looks at the value of parenting.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p class=\"TMbodycopyCOMPUTER\">We also have examinations of the recent push to stimulate the economy from a woman\u2019s perspective. Hanna Szymborska looks at the UK Chancellor\u2019s proposals while Selvin Kwong reports from Down Under.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p class=\"TMbodycopyCOMPUTER\">From a previous era of government stimulus, Tom Levitt writes about Frances Perkins who played a major role in designing the US New Deal.\u00a0 And Pam Warhurst CBE talks about her more recent experience of being a woman leading change in this issue\u2019s <i>Dentist<\/i> column.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p class=\"TMbodycopyCOMPUTER\">Following this year\u2019s Festival for Change, we feature portraits of the four young finalist teams in our challenge to produce proposals to \u201cbuild back better\u201d post pandemic.\u00a0 They are impressive young people, with two teams at the forefront of challenging sexist institutions in India: competitive education that ignores well-being; and period poverty fuelled by discriminatory taboos.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p class=\"TMbodycopyCOMPUTER\">We revisit the topic of the circular economy. Emma Fromberg seeks to revive old lessons, while I explore how retail would need reinventing to create circular economies.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p class=\"TMbodycopyCOMPUTER\">We also cover a range of other topics: Steve Keen discusses his recent paper on complexity and macro-economic modelling; Wolfram Elsner mulls over whether Joe Biden will make any difference to US policy on China; and Kevin Deane looks at the implications for teaching development economics from recent pandemic economic responses.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p class=\"TMbodycopyCOMPUTER\">And from our regular columnists, Frances Coppola looks at women\u2019s work while <i>The Outside<\/i>r urges us to find our inner Koch. Sophie Adamson is this issue\u2019s student voice reflecting on the yawning gap between her economic and philosophy studies.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p class=\"TMbodycopyCOMPUTER\">So no shortage of material for your seasonal break if you are lucky enough to have much of one in these challenging times. I send you our best wishes for 2021 from the Promoting Economic Pluralism team. We must hope and act so it can only get better.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0 Women\u2019s reality is often invisible in economic analysis and that\u2019s not hard to see. And the lack of women in economics too is clear, even outside the mainstream. The &hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":27337,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"content-type":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[1228,1658,1452,117,125,118,1321,1189],"class_list":["post-27339","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-columns","tag-care-work","tag-dec-2020","tag-feminist-economics","tag-first-word","tag-gender","tag-henry-leveson-gower","tag-institutional-economics","tag-labour"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27339","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27339"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27339\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/27337"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27339"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27339"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27339"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}