{"id":7603,"date":"2019-09-20T07:30:05","date_gmt":"2019-09-20T07:30:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/themint.kinsta.cloud\/?p=7603"},"modified":"2019-09-25T05:52:56","modified_gmt":"2019-09-25T05:52:56","slug":"the-dawning-of-the-age-of-acquisitiveness","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/the-dawning-of-the-age-of-acquisitiveness\/","title":{"rendered":"The Dawning of the Age of Acquisitiveness"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>In 1969, I was seven years old and largely oblivious to the historical events happening around the world.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Neil Armstrong stepped onto the moon, half a million people came to Woodstock to hear Jimi Hendrix, and the Stonewall riots kicked off the gay liberation movement.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\">That same year, 50 years ago, a less well-remembered event in Stockholm arguably shaped our world today even more. And not for the better. The King of Sweden presented with royal pomp the first-ever Nobel medals in economics. The fallout from that is the theme for our eleventh issue.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\">The so-called Nobel Prize in Economic Science is a case of doubly mistaken identity that could be worthy of a Shakespearian comedy if the real-world impacts were not so tragic. First it\u2019s a mistake to call it a Nobel Prize \u2013 as it was created and funded by the Swedish Central Bank three-generations after the Alfred Nobel\u2019s family set up the real prize in his name to celebrate great work in science and medicine. And it\u2019s a mistake to cast economics as a science in the same way as physics.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\">And? You may ask.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\">Writing as the global financial crisis was trashing balance sheets and economists\u2019 reputations, former trader and<i>\u00a0Black Swan<\/i>\u00a0author Nassim Nicholas Taleb had an answer.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\">\u00a0Every time he\u2019s criticised the fake assumptions behind financial market theory, which lead to the crisis, he wrote: \u201cI have been abruptly countered with: \u201cthey have the Nobel\u201d, which I have found impossible to argue with.\u201d He concluded that \u201cthe prize is not just an insult to science; it has been putting the financial system at risk of blow-ups\u201d.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s2\">And, it\u2019s not just left-wing thinkers\u00a0who\u2019ve criticised the Nobel prize in economic science. Friedrich von Hayek, Margaret Thatcher\u2019s favourite economist, said he had not thought it a good idea: \u201cOne reason was that I feared that such a prize\u2026 would tend to accentuate the swings of scientific fashion. [Another is] that the Nobel Prize confers on an individual an authority, which in economics no man ought to possess.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cThe Nobel Prize confers on an individual an authority, which in economics no man ought to possess.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p class=\"p2\">What\u2019s even more remarkable, he said that at the Nobel banquet after having received the prize, which his biographer says rescued his reputation and his conservative cause from relative obscurity.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\">If you\u2019ve seen our social media recently, you\u2019ll know that we\u2019ve created a democratic alternative: the #NotTheNobel Prize, and it\u2019s been a great pleasure to see nominations pour in from around the world, including some people who are new to me. We will be announcing the winner at the end of a live-streamed event on 3 October following lively discussion of the finalists and live online voting. I can\u2019t wait.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s5\">We have some prize-winning articles for you in this issue.\u00a0For the low-down on the \u201cfake\u201d Nobel that helped neoliberalism conquer the world\u201d check out Christian Felber\u2019s article. Of course, there have also been some really great winners of the Nobel: Ulrich Volz explains why he thinks Stieglitz is one of them while Andr\u00e9 Pedersen Ystehede and Stefan Kesting tell the fascinating tale of Schelling and his multiple talents.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\">We also focus in this issue on economic development as arguably economic theory has caused most damage in the global south. We have an interview with Kenyan economist Mwangi wa G<span class=\"s6\">\u0129<\/span>th<span class=\"s6\">\u0129<\/span>nji on African economic policy, and articles from Alessandra Mezzadri on sweatshops and Ingrid Harvold Kvangraven and her collaborators on dependency theory.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\">Ethics and values may have been chased out of the debate in top ranking economics journals, but not here.\u00a0Listen to our interview with Jonathan Aldred on his book\u00a0<i>Licence to be Bad.<\/i><\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\">And as this issue is not a bland monoculture\u2026\u00a0also check out Rita Samiolo on rankings, Nick Robins on how finance should deliver a just transition, and <span class=\"s7\">Andrew Black<\/span> on the \u201chero\u201d chief executive, Paul Polman. We also discover from Georgina Silvester why Handelsbanken, lauded by John Kay, is different.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\">And of course our regular columns with Verity contemplating whether it is her year for a Nobel, the Outsider looking at what financial services the poor really need and our A level teacher reflecting on teaching the elite\u2019s offspring development economics.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\">So do enjoy, join the #NotTheNobel online discussion and please do help us find fresh economic thinking for the 21<sup>st<\/sup> century.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In 1969, I was seven years old and largely oblivious to the historical events happening around the world. Neil Armstrong stepped onto the moon, half a million people came to &hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7604,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"content-type":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[798,132,117,118,262,600,941],"class_list":["post-7603","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-columns","tag-development","tag-economics","tag-first-word","tag-henry-leveson-gower","tag-nobel-prize","tag-npw","tag-sept-2019"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7603","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7603"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7603\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7604"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7603"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7603"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.themintmagazine.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7603"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}